[Twisted-Python] shedding root
Ken Kinder
ken at kenkinder.com
Wed Apr 6 22:48:02 MDT 2005
Jp Calderone wrote:
> There's no reason to break existing deployments, or even encourage authors to switch away from their current tap plugins, if tap plugins are satisfying their requirements. Deprecating mktap would just create a lot of unnecessary work.
>
> A document explaining the capabilities and shortcomings of tap plugins and comparing these to the other options for deploying a Twisted application is a great idea.
>
> Jp
>
>
The same could be said of most of the components of Twisted. Should one
use twisted.web, or nevow? Manhole telnet or Manhole PB? Etc. I realize
there might be some debate on use recommendations, but certainly
consensuses could be gathered.
Some place to start would be a big graph of the Twisted project, with
flags for each component indicating stability, documentation status,
future deprecation, and a short sentence about pro's and con's. Most of
this information exists for these components, but it's dispersed among
mailing list archives, docstrings, and once in a while, actual
documentation.
Something like this would be quite valuable:
- twisted.project
- ModuleA (Unstable) - Undocumented - Use ModuleB for future projects
- ModuleB (Stable) - Documented
(etc...)
-k
More information about the Twisted-Python
mailing list