[Twisted-Python] Re: Twisted and the Posh Module
Ken Kinder
ken at kenkinder.com
Mon Mar 14 17:26:49 EST 2005
Bob Ippolito wrote:
> Ideally we'd have a message-passing system that could use multiple
> backends (i.e. shared memory, mmap, or sockets). Using sockets is
> probably a better solution for now -- you're likely to do a lot of
> copying anyway, cause it's Python and PIL :)
>
> With sockets, you can scale right to multiple computers.. with shared
> memory, you're stuck on a single box. The API that POSH exposes
> (proxied non-blocking objects) can't scale well to multiple machines,
> where a socket-based API could be scaled down to actually use an
> efficient shared memory implementation at some point.
I'm not trying to distribute work among multiple boxes with this -- I
already do that. :) The goal is to free up each node's GIL in an
existing clustered application and make better use of multiple CPU's.
-Ken
More information about the Twisted-Python
mailing list