[Twisted-Python] Re: [Twisted-commits] r17325 - merge sob-491, fixes #491
Christopher Armstrong
radix at twistedmatrix.com
Wed Jun 21 11:12:10 MDT 2006
On 6/21/06, Cory Dodt <corydodt at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
> I'm all for a structured development process, but this is just being pedantic
> for the sake of being pedantic. Please tell me, how does following this rigid
> log message structure help speed twisted development? How does it contribute
> to the overall quality of Twisted in any substantive way?
>
> > <line of 78 or fewer characters summarizing change>
>
> Be serious. The haranguing about this kind of stuff is getting so tiresome
> that I've stopped making any serious attempts to commit to the trunk. As long
> as the necessary information is in there, who the heck cares how it's
> formatted? I see that glyph looked at the bug and pronounced it acceptable.
> It was possible to look this up in the bug, which is how I found out, spending
> all of 10 seconds on it.
While I don't care so much how it's 78 characters, I *do* care about
all the missing information in that commit message, given that I'm one
of the guys who has to read through commit logs while building a NEWS
file for the release. This is a good policy and everyone's been
following it beautifully for a while now.
--
Christopher Armstrong
International Man of Twistery
http://radix.twistedmatrix.com/
http://twistedmatrix.com/
http://canonical.com/
More information about the Twisted-Python
mailing list