[Twisted-Python] Re: [Stackless] That darn GIL rant again...
Andreas Kostyrka
andreas at kostyrka.org
Tue Apr 1 13:02:18 MDT 2008
Am Dienstag, den 01.04.2008, 16:33 +0300 schrieb niki:
> I disagree with point 2. "Explicit is better than implicit".
> Programmer must know where thread/process boundaries are and convey this
> to the system. This knowledge very important in order to make all kind
> of algorithmic decisions.
While explicit is usually better then implicit, in the area of threading
Python follows the fully implicit path. The GIL is nothing else but a
completely magic way to make Python threadsafe. Furthermore, any
solution around this must take this automatic safety into account.
Andreas
>
> Niki Spahiev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stackless mailing list
> Stackless at stackless.com
> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: </pipermail/twisted-python/attachments/20080401/bd9c8a65/attachment.sig>
More information about the Twisted-Python
mailing list