<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:00 AM, lasizoillo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lasizoillo@gmail.com">lasizoillo@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2009/11/11 Kevin Horn <<a href="mailto:kevin.horn@gmail.com">kevin.horn@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div class="im">><br>
> I have written up a proposal here:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://twistedsphinx.funsize.net/proposal.html" target="_blank">http://twistedsphinx.funsize.net/proposal.html</a><br>
><br>
<br>
</div>In this proposal you say:<br>
<br>
Development Work<br>
* fabric fabfile for automation of docs workflow<br>
<br>
Future Work<br>
* This page has some stuff on using cog in RestructuredText comments<br>
to generate the output of sample scripts.<br>
<br>
The second point (in Future Work) uses cog that is integrated in paver:<br>
* Paver allow automation of docs workflow (fabric is not needed).<br>
* With paver you can create an bootstraped instalation:<br>
<a href="http://www.blueskyonmars.com/projects/paver/getting_started.html#but-people-don-t-have-paver-yet" target="_blank">http://www.blueskyonmars.com/projects/paver/getting_started.html#but-people-don-t-have-paver-yet</a><br>
* Paver is compatible with setuptools and distutils.<br>
<br>
I think that fabric is great for cluster distributions, but paver is<br>
better for manage docs.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Javi<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>For the moment, I plan to continue using fabric, for the following reasons:<br><br>- I'm already familiar with it<br>- it does what I need (run local commands, and send stuff over SSH)<br>
<br>I think Paver might be very useful down the road, though. I'll definitely check into it more as this project progresses.<br><br>Kevin Horn<br>